Friday, February 19, 2010

Elton John claims Jesus was gay

(CBS) Elton John is facing backlash from Christian groups after stating in an interview that Jesus was gay.
In the interview, published in Parade magazine on Friday, John said that Jesus was "a compassionate, super-intelligent gay man who understood human problems."

I love it. Anything that pisses the bible huggers off is entertaining. I’m not a religious person, but in my view, Jesus is whoever you want him to be. I mean, let’s face it. The bible is a work of fiction. It’s a fantasy. Nothing in the bible can be proved one way or another. If you want Jesus to be a whore that bangs lots of hoes, then that is who Jesus is. If you’re gay, then naturally, Jesus is gay. If you’re white, Jesus is white. If you’re black, then so is Jesus. If you’re female, then guess what? He’s a she! The bible is up to interpretation. So if people believe in something, then I guess the bible can back that up in some form or other. Most people who guard the bible with their life believe that Jesus loves everybody equally. That is, as long as they’re not gay or black? Right?

I love the flaw in their logic. Look at the bible hugging homophobes who consider homosexuality a sin. Does Jesus think it’s a sin? He does if you’re a homophobe. Now, in my view, God (if there is a God, of course) created all of us in his image. Hell, I think it even says that in the bible. We are exactly how he wanted us to be. Right? Then if someone is gay, it’s a sin? I don’t understand this. How can it be a sin if that is the way they were made? God made that person gay! Does that mean that God had an error in judgment? Are you going to rally against God’s work? I should hope not. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to piss off my creator. Who knows what he has in store for his children.

I like Elton John’s view of Jesus. I can imagine that that’s how Jesus really was. Is Elton wrong? Am I wrong in agreeing with him? Well, like I said before, it’s all up to interpretation. If you think we’re wrong, then I guess we’re wrong. But it also works this way: we think you’re wrong, too. Does it change anything? Of course not. I look at it like this. When you read a novel, you naturally conjure up images as to what characters look like. Everyone’s images will be different. So why should people’s image of Jesus be any different?

I’m sure I will have pissed off some people in writing this. That’s to be expected. After all, my views will be different from them. They’ll see that I have a valid point and that would likely be the reason why I pissed them off. But that’s okay. We can’t agree all the time. What fun would that be?

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

Well, it looks like it just might be possible that Obama will come through on one of his campaign promises – one that I agree with – appealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).

There’s no excuse for this discrimination. None. There’s many, many homosexuals serving in our military right now and there’s no problems. So what the fuck makes people think that a little piece of legislation like DADT is keeping things in order? Is the system going to fall apart if DADT is killed? I think not. It would probably encourage more faggots to serve our country. And at the end of the day, that’s what it’s all about. Citizens serving their country.

Do heterosexuals have such a problem with their sexuality that the thought of working with a homo brings them to the brink of insanity? Or their fear that the homo will hit on them because they think they’re so attractive? Are they that arrogant? After all, that’d be a compliment and they should be flattered that a faggot thinks they’re hot. Or maybe they’re so uncomfortable with their sexuality that they might act on impulse? Someone dropping the soap, bending down to pick it up would get him excited? I guess I can see what problems this might cause. After all, the last thing we’d want is an orgy going on, right? These soldiers work hard and god forbid should we let them get their rocks off once in awhile and maybe have some fun!  It’s not like these things aren’t happening already.

If DADT is to remain in place, then I think it should be used to keep heterosexuals in order, too. They shouldn’t go around parading their sexuality, either. Let everyone stay in the closet. That’d be only fair. It would put them in the shoes of the homo. Let’s see if they’d like it then. If it’s revealed that a soldier likes to suck cock, then he will be discharged. If it’s revealed that a soldier likes to pound the pussy, then he too will be discharged. Fair is fair.

John McCain isn’t too happy about the possibility of DADT being overturned. Here’s my message to Johnny: Hey Johnny, if you’re gonna be a warmonger, then you’re gonna need all the manpower you can get to fight these useless fucking wars that you’ve got such a hard on about. You’re gonna need every last faggot you can find.

In my opinion, homosexuals should have the right to die in useless wars just like everybody else. There shouldn’t be discrimination on death. We all have to go some time. Might as well go while you’re serving your country. Appeal this bullshit law and allow more of our great citizens to serve this great country.

PS: I use the term ‘serve our country’ lightly because our military hardly serves our country anymore. The last time we were in a legitimate war was World War II, and was probably the last time anyone ‘served’ our country. Since then, we’ve been serving other countries and blowing up brown people in our attempt to save the world.