The Right Age for Drinking
It isn't 18, whatever some college officials think.
Sunday, August 24, 2008; Page B06
COLLEGE OFFICIALS who have signed on to the provocative proposition that the legal drinking age of 21 isn't working say that they just want to start a debate. Perhaps when they get done with that, they can move on to whether Earth really orbits the sun. Any suggestion that the current drinking age hasn't saved lives runs counter to the facts.
More than 100 presidents and chancellors from such top universities as Duke and Johns Hopkins say it's time to rethink the drinking age, contending it has caused "a culture of dangerous, clandestine 'binge-drinking.' " The statement does not specifically advocate reducing the drinking age, but many who signed it say they thought legal drinking should begin at 18.
Health and safety experts have reacted with dismay, because raising the drinking age has saved many lives. In 2001, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reviewed 49 studies published in scientific journals and concluded that alcohol-related traffic crashes involving young people increased 10 percent when the drinking age was lowered in the 1970s and decreased 16 percent when the drinking age was raised. The retreat from a lower drinking age translates into some 900 lives saved each year among 16- to 20-year-olds. Those who would argue that other factors, such as safer cars, are responsible should take a good look at numbers posted by Mothers Against Drunk Driving showing alcohol-related traffic fatalities among 16- to 20-year-olds decreasing 60 percent between 1982 and 2006 while non-alcohol-related fatalities increased 34 percent.
ad_icon
The college presidents are right about binge drinking. Each year, some 1,700 college students die from causes related to alcohol use; there is also the toll of injuries and sexual assaults fueled by alcohol. But where is the logic of solving the underage drinking problem by lowering the age even more? Henry Wechsler, the Harvard expert whose studies of binge drinking popularized the phrase, put it best, comparing lowering the drinking age to "pouring gasoline to put the fire out."
Work by experts such as Mr. Wechsler, as well as the experience of college officials committed to solutions, shows that strong steps to enforce the law and change the culture can produce results. Instead of talking about lowering the drinking age (and thereby shifting the problem to high schools), colleges should be working to develop better enforcement methods, expand education and counseling, and end pricing practices that make alcohol more accessible and attractive. Then, too, college officials can stop winking at fraternity bashes that, whether they are willing to admit it or not, add to the allure of going off to college.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/23/AR2008082301748.html
Do these people not see the problem? The problem is that we are restricting the kid's access to alcohol. The kids do not know how to handle alcohol. Period. And then when they do get a hold of alcohol, they drink it like they'll never have another chance of drinking it again. What needs to happen, is parents need to teach their children how to drink at a very young age. Make the alcohol available to them, that way they aren't sneaking around behind their backs and taking the booze and doing stupid things. There needs to be a trust system between the parent and child.
In other countries, the parents give their child a glass of wine with each dinner. They do not have a alcohol problem like the US does. Hmmm, I wonder why? Because they know how to handle their alcohol. They have been taught. The alcohol is available to them so they are not over drinking. It's there. They can have it whenever they want, that way they're not sneaking around behind their parent's backs and doing dumb things.
I know this isn't going to change in this country, but I feel that if a person is old enough to serve his or her country, then he or she is fucking old enough to buy themselves an alcoholic beverage. The legal age for drinking and gambling should be 18. Otherwise, they mine as well make the legal age 21. Because in my opinion, they're not adults unless they can do everything that adults can do legally.
In other countries, the parents give their child a glass of wine with each dinner. They do not have a alcohol problem like the US does. Hmmm, I wonder why? Because they know how to handle their alcohol. They have been taught. The alcohol is available to them so they are not over drinking. It's there. They can have it whenever they want, that way they're not sneaking around behind their parent's backs and doing dumb things.
I know this isn't going to change in this country, but I feel that if a person is old enough to serve his or her country, then he or she is fucking old enough to buy themselves an alcoholic beverage. The legal age for drinking and gambling should be 18. Otherwise, they mine as well make the legal age 21. Because in my opinion, they're not adults unless they can do everything that adults can do legally.
No comments:
Post a Comment